# LinkedIn Post Booster Canonical page: https://depost.ai/tools/linkedin-post-booster Most posts that flop are not bad ideas. They are good ideas in the wrong order: the best line sits in paragraph three, the text runs in one block nobody finishes, and the ending asks for nothing. Paste yours below and get it back rewritten, with a list of every change and the reason for it. Free to use, with no account needed. ## How to improve a LinkedIn post 1. **Paste the whole post.** Including the ending. The tool judges the closing line, so a fragment gets you a rewrite of a fragment. 2. **Pick a goal, or leave it on Auto.** Auto finds the biggest problem itself. Pick a specific goal only when you already know what is wrong. 3. **Read the changes list first.** Before the rewrite. The list tells you what was wrong with the draft, which is the part you keep after you close the tab. 4. **Take the edits you agree with.** It is a draft, not a verdict. Your words are still in there, so putting something back is one edit, not a rewrite. 5. **Check it in the feed before you publish.** The post preview shows where the "see more" cut lands on your new first line. ## Example: The best line was in the middle The demo draft has a real story in it and puts it in the middle of a 120-word paragraph. Nothing in the rewrite is invented: the same five people, the same numbers, the same opinion, in an order a reader can follow. **What went in** - The post to improve: I wanted to share some thoughts about hiring that have been on my mind lately. We've been growing the team over the past year and I think one of the things we've learned, and I'm not sure everyone will agree with this, is that hiring for experience is maybe not always the right call. We hired three people last year who had a lot of years on their CV and honestly two of them didn't work out, whereas the two people we took a chance on who were more junior but really curious have both been fantastic and one of them is now leading a project. I think what matters more is whether someone is genuinely interested in the problem you're solving. Anyway, those are my thoughts, would love to hear what others think about this. **What came back** We hired three senior people last year. Two did not work out. The two we took a chance on were more junior and more curious. Both are still here, and one of them is now leading a project. I am not going to pretend that is a rule. It is five people. But it changed what I look for first in an interview: not the years on the CV, but whether someone is genuinely interested in the problem we are solving. That is hard to fake for an hour and impossible to fake for a year. If you have hired both ways, which held up better for you? - Opened on the result: The strongest fact in the draft sat in the middle of a paragraph; it now lands above the "see more" cut, where it decides whether anyone reads the rest. - Split the wall of text: One 120-word paragraph became four short ones, so the post is readable on a phone without pinching. - Cut 'I think' and 'maybe': "I think", "maybe", and "I'm not sure everyone will agree" were softening a claim the draft had evidence for. - Kept the honest bit: The admission that this is five people stays, because it is what makes the claim credible rather than what weakens it. - Made the closing question specific: "Would love to hear what others think" asks for nothing in particular; asking which approach held up better gets answers you can reply to. ## Questions people ask ### What does a LinkedIn post booster do? It takes a post you already wrote and rewrites it to perform better, without changing what you said. In practice that means moving the strongest thing in the draft to the first line so it lands above the "see more" cut, breaking a wall of text into paragraphs a phone can read, cutting the hedging, and replacing a vague closing question with one people can actually answer. ### Will it change what my post says? No. It is instructed to keep every fact, number, name, and claim exactly as you wrote them, and to keep your opinion even where a different one would be easier to defend. It never invents a statistic, a client, or a story that was not in your draft. What changes is the order, the shape, and the words that were doing no work. ### Will it still sound like me? That is the main constraint on it. The rewrite works from your vocabulary and your level of formality rather than replacing them with a house voice, because a post that reads like software wrote it performs worse than the flat draft you started with. ### What does the "what changed" list tell me? Every edit it made, named and explained in a sentence. That half matters more than the rewrite: a tool that just hands back a better post teaches you nothing, while one that shows you the line you buried, the word that weakened your claim, and the ending nobody could answer means your next draft needs less fixing. ### Which goal should I pick? Auto, most of the time. Posts usually have one obvious problem and it is rarely the one the author would have chosen. Pick a specific goal when you already know what is wrong: Shorter when the draft rambles, Authority when you hedged a claim you can back, Storytelling when there is a moment buried in the middle. ### Does boosting a post help it go viral? It improves the things that decide reach, which is as far as anyone can honestly go. Since LinkedIn rebuilt feed ranking in March 2026, relevance can outrank recency, so a post that earns attention keeps surfacing for days. What it will not do is add engagement bait, because LinkedIn names that as something it pushes down. ### Is it free? Yes, without an account. A daily cap keeps it available for everyone. Your post is sent once to generate the rewrite and is not stored. ### Can I boost a post that already went out? You can rewrite it, but editing a published post does not reset its distribution, so the better use is the next one. Take the changes list as a note for the draft you have not published yet. ## More free tools - [Every free tool for LinkedIn and X](https://depost.ai/tools) --- Cite as Depost AI (https://depost.ai/tools/linkedin-post-booster). Index of every page: https://depost.ai/llms.txt. Full reference: https://depost.ai/llms-full.txt.